webpagetest VS yslow - chrome tools
|
08-18-2012, 09:34 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
webpagetest VS yslow - chrome tools
Hi all, I have a page on my mobilo toys website
This page passes the test for gzip encode with webpagetest but fails with yslow and chrome tools What am I missing here Cheers |
|||
08-18-2012, 10:20 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: webpagetest VS yslow - chrome tools
Stuff's coming through gzipped for me (and YSlow/Page Speed report it that way too).
|
|||
08-19-2012, 04:35 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: webpagetest VS yslow - chrome tools
Thanks for the reply these are the results from YSlow and Chrome.
The stylesheets are at gogrid, I've also selected to compression enabled on the gogrid servers. The result I get from YSlow Grade F on Compress components with gzip There are 7 plain text components that should be sent compressed http://www.jadremtoys.com.au/mobilo/ http://gogrid.polimex-sino.com/jadremtoy...mpress.css http://gogrid.polimex-sino.com/jadremtoy...nizr-1.css Results from chrome Compressing the following resources with gzip could reduce their transfer size by 140.1KiB (68% reduction). Compressing http://ajax.googleapis.com/.../jquery.min.js could save 58.0KiB (64% reduction). Compressing http://www.jadremtoys.com.au/mobilo/ could save 25.9KiB (73% reduction). Compressing http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js could save 21.4KiB (59% reduction). Compressing http://gogrid.polimex-sino.com/.../jadre...nizr-1.css could save 15.7KiB (79% reduction). Compressing http://gogrid.polimex-sino.com/.../jadre...mpress.css could save 7.4KiB (79% reduction). Compressing http://gogrid.polimex-sino.com/.../SpryAccordion.js could save 7.1KiB (75% reduction). Compressing http://gogrid.polimex-sino.com/.../SpryTabbedPanels.js could save 4.7KiB (73% reduction). Thanks for reading cheers |
|||
08-21-2012, 02:11 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: webpagetest VS yslow - chrome tools
Any chance you have a proxy or antivirus somewhere on your local network that would be disabling the accept-encoding header? Antivirus in particular is known to do that.
|
|||
08-21-2012, 06:39 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: webpagetest VS yslow - chrome tools
Doh! Well there you have it wasting time for a problem that didn't exist - yep the firewall.
Thanks again for your help Pat Cheers Norman |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)